JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 18, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Libardo De Jesus Mora Medina

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad De Sentencias Proferidas Por Sala Plena
  • Constituyen un cambio del precedente judicial
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia de la Sala Plena
  • Requisitos de legitimidad y oportunidad
  • Requisitos de procedencia
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud nulidad de sentencia.

El memorialista promovió incidente de nulidad contra el ordinal decimoquinto de la parte resolutiva de la sentencia SU.917/10, alegando como único cargo el desconocimiento del precedente de la Corporación respecto a los efectos de la cosa juzgada en materia constitucional y el contenido y alcance de los efectos inter comunis de las sentencias de tutela y violación al principio de igualdad.

La Sala decide DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad impetrada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad del ordinal decimoquinto de la sentencia SU-917 de 2010, solicitada por el senor Libardo de Jesus Mora Medina.
  2. SEGUNDO. Efectuar la devolucion del expediente correspondiente a la accion de tutela presentada por el senor Mora Medina a la Secretaria General del Consejo de Estado.
  3. TERCERO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.